BCCI Ombudsman Justice (Retd) D Okay Jain has sought a written submission from Sourav Ganguly and the three complainants within the alleged Battle of Curiosity case towards the the previous India captain.
Three Bengal-based cricket followers — Bhaswati Shantua, Abhijeet Mukherjee and Ranjit Seal — had alleged that Ganguly’s obligation as Cricket Affiliation of Bengal (CAB) president is in direct battle together with his function as an advisor of IPL franchise, Delhi Capitals.
The Ombudsman, who can be the Ethics Officer, heard senior Supreme Courtroom advocate Biswanath Chatterjee and complainant Ranjit Seal in addition to Ganguly for shut to 3 and a half hours. “I’ve heard each the events in addition to the BCCI and can quickly give my order. Nevertheless since listening to is over as per rules of pure justice, each events may give their written submissions earlier than the ultimate order is pronounced,” Justice Jain stated after the assembly.
When requested if there’s a timeline, he stated: “In fact, there’s a timeline. I can’t let you know what occurred because the matter is sub-judice. However the order will come out quickly.”
Ganguly, on his half, stated that the “assembly went off properly” earlier than leaving the premises.
BCCI officers again Ganguly
The BCCI termed that the previous India captain’s alleged battle of curiosity comes underneath the ‘tractable class’ which could possibly be sorted with out a lot fuss and with “full disclosure“.
In line with the BCCI’s structure clause 38 (3) (a): “Tractable conflicts are these which can be resolvable or permissible or excusable via recusal of the person involved and – or – with full disclosure of the curiosity concerned.”
It’s learnt that the Committee of Directors (CoA) doesn’t need Ganguly to be penalised if he makes “full disclosure“.
“Agreed that he resigned from IPL technical committee and Governing Council after the sub-committees have been dissolved when new structure got here into power. Sure, he’s nonetheless part of Cricket Advisory Committee (CAC) however that committee has met solely twice in 4 years,” a senior BCCI official aware about the event stated.
“How can we cease him from performing his skilled actions as a cricketer? Let the Ombudsman determine as this could possibly be sorted with none drawback. If full disclosure is made, the BCCI sees no hurt in persevering with in all three posts. If Ombudsman feels in any other case, he might must resign from two of three posts,” the official stated.
Nevertheless, if Ganguly is to resign from CAC, even Sachin Tendulkar (mentor, Mumbai Indians) and VVS Laxman (mentor, Sunrisers Hyderabad) could possibly be pressured to observe swimsuit.
So far as adminstration is anxious, Ganguly’s six-year tenure earlier than the necessary cooling-off as an office-bearer will solely finish in July 2020.
In his deposition, Ganguly stated that he’s working in a voluntary function with the IPL franchise.
“Sourav, in his verbal submission, advised the Ombudsman that he’s not taking a single penny as DC advisor despite the fact that his title is there within the Staff Officers’ checklist,” a supply stated.
Nevertheless there was some deliberation as in his earlier affidavit, Ganguly had claimed his function in Delhi Capitals was “casual” and he had apparently “resigned” from CAC nevertheless it was discovered in any other case.
“The CAC nonetheless exists and he is part of it and on the identical time his title as a Staff Official makes it clear that his function isn’t casual,” a supply near one of many complainants stated.